Review Process

Initial Screening : The committee screens submissions for compliance with basic requirements, such as format, length, and relevance. Non-compliant submissions may be returned for revision or rejected.

Double-Blind Peer Review : Submissions undergo a double-blind review to evaluate originality, relevance, rigor, clarity, and impact. Reviewers provide comments and recommendations, which may include accepting, revising, or rejecting them.

Reviewer Feedback and Revisions: The committee will consolidate the feedback and authors may be asked to revise based on reviewer comments.

Final Decision: The committee will communicate the final decisions to authors regarding acceptance, conditional acceptance, or rejection by January 3rd, 2025.